Sparkling wine production
Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Traditional Base wine is bottled with sugar and yeast & secondary fermentation occurs in bottle. Yeast is then removed by riddling and the bottle topped up and sealed with a cork. Widely used for quality sparkling wines e.g. Champagne. |
Widely recognised as producing the highest quality product. | Expensive in space, time and labour |
Aeration Dissolving carbon dioxide into a base wine in a pressurised tank. Used for the cheapest sparkling wines. |
Quick, cheap and easy to perform | Bubbles are large and aggressive No lees contact effect Must be labelled ‘aerated’ |
Cuve Close, Bulk or Charmat Sugar and yeast are added to the base wine in a pressurised tank, which may contain agitators to increase yeast contact. After fermentation, the yeast is cooled, clarified, and then bottled under pressure. Widely used, e.g. in Prosecco & German Sekt. |
Economies of scale and space. More homogenous product Can produces more ‘fruity’ wine styles |
Less lees contact effect |
Transfer method Wine is bottled with yeast and sugar and undergoes secondary AF in the bottle. Wine is cooled, bottles decanted into bulk tanks, wine filtered & re-bottled. Used in Australia & USA. Machinery is expensive. |
Similar quality to traditional method, but more practical. Product can be labelled ‘fermented in a bottle’ |
Machinery is expensive. |
Also:
- Méthode Rurale
- Continuous flow method
- Méthode Dioise
- Asti method
Tag: